Nikon NIKKOR Z 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Nikon
78 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon
64 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Nikon NIKKOR Z 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
No customer feedback yet
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.
Pros
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality
- Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
- Excellent for low-light photography
- Versatile for sports and portraits
- Robust build quality
Cons
- No image stabilization
- Heavy and bulky
- Tripod collar design issues
- Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
- Canon no longer supports repairs
Image quality 35
Autofocus performance 28
Build quality 22
Weight and size 18
Image stabilization 15
Value for money 12
Scores
Landscape
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR | Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 17 |
| Groups | 7 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Coating | Super Integrated Coating | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 1.07 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4.5 stops | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 200 mm★ | 700 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.2x | 0.3x★ |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Scores 78 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.