Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

Canon
62 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

88 out of 100 high confidence 115 reviews

The Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lens is widely praised for its compact size, sharp image quality, and excellent value. Users love it as a lightweight walk-around lens for travel, street photography, and landscapes, with many noting its surprisingly good macro mode and low-light performance. A few criticisms mention vignetting at wide apertures, noisy autofocus, and lack of image stabilization, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Sharp image quality
  • Excellent value for money
  • Great for travel and street photography
  • Surprisingly good macro mode
Cons
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
  • Noisy autofocus in some cases
  • No image stabilization
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Slow autofocus for video
👍 Image quality 28
👍 Size and weight 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Low light performance 10
👍 Macro mode 6
👎 Autofocus noise 4

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

Scores

Street
Canon
59
Viltrox
71
Budget
Canon
59
Viltrox
67
Macro
Canon
50
Viltrox
64
Portrait
Canon
39
Viltrox
62
Video Cinema
Canon
52
Viltrox
61
Travel
Canon
61
Viltrox
56
Wildlife Sports
Canon
55
Viltrox
59
Professional
Canon
57
Viltrox
53
Landscape
Canon
56
Viltrox
54

Specifications

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mmViltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min24 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm35 mm
Elements611
Groups59
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.13 kg★0.17 kg
Filter Thread52 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance160 mm★330 mm
Max Magnification0.27x1:7.7★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 69 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm Better at:

TravelProfessional

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports