Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
Fujifilm
61 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Viltrox
86 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm | Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 15 |
| Groups | 8 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Super EBC | HD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | 280 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7★ | 0.15x |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm0.100score per dollar
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm0.145score per dollar
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.
