OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm
OM System
74 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 20 |
| Groups | 11 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | ZERO coating | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/6.3 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.46 kg★ | 0.61 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 220 mm | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:2.7 | 1:2 |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm0.071score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.107score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
