BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm

BM Premium
38 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm

35 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The lens receives mixed feedback: some users praise its value for money and image quality for certain uses like architecture, but many report serious issues including incompatibility with Canon EOS R8, poor image quality, flimsy plastic build, and slow autofocus unsuitable for wildlife. The need for a tripod due to bulkiness and manual focus annoyance are also noted.

Pros
  • Good value for money
  • Decent image quality for architecture
  • Pleasant for certain projects
Cons
  • Incompatible with Canon EOS R8
  • Poor image quality
  • Flimsy plastic zoom mechanism
  • Slow autofocus for wildlife
  • Bulky requiring tripod
👎 Image quality 4
👎 Build quality 2
👎 Compatibility 1
👎 Autofocus performance 2
🤔 Value for money 2
👎 Portability 1

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

88 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a versatile and affordable alternative to Sony's GM lenses. Users appreciate its performance in portraits and low light, though some note the plastic build and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Overall, it is considered an excellent value for both enthusiasts and professionals.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile focal range
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Plastic build quality
  • No weather sealing
  • Zoom ring reversed from focus ring
  • Slightly long for discrete use
  • Colors slightly duller than GM lenses
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Low light performance 5

Scores

Budget
BM Premium
48
Tamron
88
Video Cinema
BM Premium
42
Tamron
86
Professional
BM Premium
34
Tamron
85
Macro
BM Premium
45
Tamron
85
Portrait
BM Premium
40
Tamron
82
Street
BM Premium
33
Tamron
75
Landscape
BM Premium
38
Tamron
74
Travel
BM Premium
37
Tamron
69
Wildlife Sports
BM Premium
32
Tamron
66

Specifications

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min420 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max1600 mm75 mm
Elements—17
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—2★
Coatingmulti-coated optical glassFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/8.3f/2.8
Min Aperturef/8.3f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountSony ASony E
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.98 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance420 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm is €677 cheaper (2.9x less).

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm0.108score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.088score per dollar

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm offers 1.2x better value for money

BM Premium 420mm Lens 420-1600mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider