Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon
85 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This lens is widely praised for its excellent optics, lightweight design, and quiet STM autofocus, making it a great everyday and travel lens. Users note it rivals Canon's L-series in image quality while being much more affordable, though some mention the plastic mount and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Verified buyers highlight its sharpness, effective image stabilization, and value for money, especially when purchased as a kit lens. However, a few users report limitations with autofocus points on certain camera bodies and note it is not a true macro lens.

Pros
  • Excellent image quality rivaling L-series
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Quiet and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Plastic mount instead of metal
  • No weather sealing
  • Limited autofocus points on some bodies
  • Not a true macro lens
  • Inferior image quality to 18-135mm
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Image stabilization 3
👍 Weight and portability 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
95
Canon
80
Budget
Sony
90
Canon
86
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
89
Street
Sony
88
Canon
86
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
75
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
70
Landscape
Sony
82
Canon
70
Portrait
Sony
82
Canon
75
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
69

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mmCanon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm55 mm
Elements912
Groups810
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Super Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.20 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm66 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x1:4★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider