TTArtisan 500mm F6.3 500mm

TTArtisan 500mm F6.3 500mm

TTArtisan
26 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
77 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
TTArtisan
32
Nikon
82
Budget
TTArtisan
20
Nikon
78
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
25
Nikon
75
Portrait
TTArtisan
18
Nikon
73
Professional
TTArtisan
23
Nikon
69
Street
TTArtisan
24
Nikon
67
Landscape
TTArtisan
29
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
26
Nikon
55
Travel
TTArtisan
25
Nikon
55

Specifications

TTArtisan 500mm F6.3 500mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min500 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm35 mm
Elements817
Groups512
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements22
CoatingMC multi layer coatingsNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/6.3f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades12★9
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weight0.49 kg★0.68 kg
Filter Thread82 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySilent Wave Motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—2.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.30 m290 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan 500mm F6.3 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 77 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports