Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

Nikon
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
80
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
82
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
74
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
87
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
83
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
74
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
67
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
74
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
68

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1616
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.56 kg
Filter Thread72 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:4.55

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II Better at:

Budget