Sigma 49B969

Sigma 49B969

Sigma
60 Overall Score
vs
HOLGA HL-C 60mm

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

HOLGA
40 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
80
HOLGA
48
Macro
Sigma
71
HOLGA
25
Professional
Sigma
69
HOLGA
44
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
HOLGA
49
Street
Sigma
60
HOLGA
50
Budget
Sigma
55
HOLGA
43
Landscape
Sigma
52
HOLGA
33
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
HOLGA
37
Travel
Sigma
34
HOLGA
45

Specifications

Sigma 49B969HOLGA HL-C 60mm
Optics
Typeprimestandard
Focal Length Min20 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm60 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating, Nano Porous Coating (NPC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/8
Min Aperturef/2f/8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight4.13 kg0.03 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm
Max Magnification1:6.67

Pros & Cons

Sigma 49B969

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 49B969

Scores 60 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma 49B969 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

HOLGA HL-C 60mm Better at:

Travel