Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2x Macro 60mm

Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2x Macro 60mm

Brightin Star
53 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Brightin Star
43
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Brightin Star
22
Nikon
94
Travel
Brightin Star
26
Nikon
92
Landscape
Brightin Star
31
Nikon
88
Professional
Brightin Star
29
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Brightin Star
33
Nikon
82
Street
Brightin Star
32
Nikon
81
Portrait
Brightin Star
36
Nikon
78
Macro
Brightin Star
72
Nikon
74

Specifications

Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2x Macro 60mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min60 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm200 mm
Elements1019
Groups715
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingIMC Coating TechnologyARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.70 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlystepping motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification2:1★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2x Macro 60mm

  • Strong macro (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports