Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Sigma
99 Overall Score
vs
fanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)

fanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)

fanshang
46 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

88 out of 100 high confidence 91 reviews

The Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary is widely praised as a compact, lightweight, and sharp standard zoom for APS-C mirrorless cameras. Users consistently highlight its excellent image quality, fast f/2.8 aperture, and affordable price as major strengths, making it a popular upgrade from kit lenses. Common criticisms include the lack of optical stabilization and a poorly designed lens hood, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast f/2.8 constant aperture
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and silent autofocus
Cons
  • No optical image stabilization
  • Poorly designed lens hood
  • No weather sealing
  • Plastic build quality
  • Zoom ring direction opposite to Fujifilm
👍 Image quality 25
🤔 Build quality 12
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Size and weight 20
👍 Autofocus performance 10
👎 Stabilization 8

fanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)

78 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 lens is widely praised for its outstanding sharpness, compact size, and remarkable value for money. Users consistently highlight the excellent optical performance, especially on higher-megapixel sensors, and appreciate its lightweight design for travel and street photography. The main drawbacks are the audible autofocus noise, which can be heard from a few feet away, and autofocus speed that lags behind native Fuji glass. Overall, it's considered a fantastic budget prime that delivers professional-quality images despite a few minor compromises.

Pros
  • outstanding sharpness
  • compact and lightweight design
  • excellent value for money
  • great bokeh quality
  • good for low light
Cons
  • audible autofocus noise
  • autofocus speed lags behind native glass
  • minimum focus distance of 55cm
  • plastic/resin build may feel cheap
  • minimal controls
👍 Sharpness 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Size and weight 7
👎 Autofocus noise 2
🤔 Autofocus speed 3
🤔 Build quality 2

Scores

Travel
Sigma
100
fanshang
45
Street
Sigma
96
fanshang
64
Budget
Sigma
92
fanshang
46
Professional
Sigma
91
fanshang
48
Portrait
Sigma
90
fanshang
51
Macro
Sigma
88
fanshang
41
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
fanshang
49
Landscape
Sigma
77
fanshang
40
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
76
fanshang
49

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DNfanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm56 mm
Elements1311
Groups109
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements14★
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.29 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread55 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorSTM★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance121 mm★550 mm
Max Magnification1:2.8★0.11x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile

fanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

fanshang Viltrox Lens 56mm F1.7 STM (X-Mount)

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider