Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

Olympus
56 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Olympus
47
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Olympus
49
Nikon
94
Travel
Olympus
49
Nikon
92
Landscape
Olympus
39
Nikon
88
Professional
Olympus
63
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Olympus
57
Nikon
82
Street
Olympus
66
Nikon
81
Portrait
Olympus
63
Nikon
78
Macro
Olympus
71
Nikon
74

Specifications

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min60 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm200 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements11
Coating—ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsNikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.05 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMSCstepping motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:1★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports