Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm

Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm

Leica
61 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Leica
72
Nikon
95
Portrait
Leica
76
Nikon
89
Street
Leica
68
Nikon
86
Budget
Leica
61
Nikon
86
Macro
Leica
57
Nikon
85
Landscape
Leica
70
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Leica
61
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Leica
75
Nikon
78
Travel
Leica
53
Nikon
75

Specifications

Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1813
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-layer coatings, AquaDura coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-4.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.99 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.27x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports