Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
74 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Viltrox
89 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 15 |
| Groups | 10 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | HD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.15x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.390score per dollar
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm0.149score per dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
