Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Budget
Street
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 9 |
| Groups | 10 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.11 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
