Canon L EF 17-40mm USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM

Canon
21 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
22
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
7
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
31
Nikon
85
Street
Canon
24
Nikon
84
Portrait
Canon
23
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Canon
25
Nikon
82
Landscape
Canon
20
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Canon
24
Nikon
73
Travel
Canon
24
Nikon
70

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/17f/2.8
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight—0.45 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Stepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM

  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports