HP A3RL9AA

HP A3RL9AA

HP
9 Overall Score
vs
JBL Tune 670NC

JBL Tune 670NC

JBL
92 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
HP
16
JBL
93
Commute
HP
6
JBL
82
Gaming
HP
2
JBL
81
Work
HP
3
JBL
79
Music
HP
7
JBL
74
Studio
HP
7
JBL
68
Calls
HP
3
JBL
66

Specifications

HP A3RL9AAJBL Tune 670NC
Design
Form Factor—on-ear
Open/Closed—closed
Foldable—✓★
Weight0.57 kg0.17 kg★
Ear Cushion—soft ear cushions
Headband—padded headband
Audio
Driver Type—dynamic
Driver Size—32 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—20 kHz★
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB★
Max SPL—95 dB★
Hi-Res Audio—✗
Codecs—SBC, AAC, LC3
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless—✓★
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Detachable Cable—✓★
Cable Length—1.2192000150680542 m
Battery
Battery Life—70 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—5min=3hrs
Charging—USB-C★
Capacity—690 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone—✓★
Mic Count—1★
NC Mic—✓★
Boom Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistant—voice assistant
Touch Controls—✗
App—JBL Headphones
Gaming Mode—✓★

Pros & Cons

HP A3RL9AA

  • Below average comfort (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile

JBL Tune 670NC

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

HP A3RL9AA0.103score per dollar
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.105score per dollar

JBL Tune 670NC offers 10.7x better value for money

HP A3RL9AA

JBL Tune 670NC

Verdict

★ Winner: JBL Tune 670NC

Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 39 specs.

JBL Tune 670NC Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider