Bose 880066-0100

Bose 880066-0100

Bose
55 Overall Score
vs
Cisco HS-WL-980-BUNA-C

Cisco HS-WL-980-BUNA-C

Cisco
11 Overall Score

Scores

Work
Bose
60
Cisco
6
Budget
Bose
60
Cisco
17
Calls
Bose
57
Cisco
3
Gaming
Bose
56
Cisco
8
Commute
Bose
53
Cisco
5
Music
Bose
44
Cisco
9
Studio
Bose
28
Cisco
9

Specifications

Bose 880066-0100Cisco HS-WL-980-BUNA-C
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Weight0.25 kg0.28 kg
Audio
CodecsAAC
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint
Detachable Cable
Battery
Battery Life24 hrs
Charge Time4 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose Music

Pros & Cons

Bose 880066-0100

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong anc (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average comfort (32nd percentile)

Cisco HS-WL-980-BUNA-C

  • Below average battery (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average sound (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (31st percentile)

Pricing

Bose 880066-0100

No current pricing available

Cisco HS-WL-980-BUNA-C

Verdict

Winner: Bose 880066-0100

Scores 55 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 20 specs.

Bose 880066-0100 Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider