Bowers & Wilkins FP42978

Bowers & Wilkins FP42978

Bowers & Wilkins
14 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Beyerdynamic
85 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Bowers & Wilkins FP42978

No customer feedback yet

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

78 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

These headphones are praised for their analytical sound, exceptional separation, and bass texture, especially with aptX lossless codecs. However, they are not recommended for casual listening or movies due to a fatiguing and unforgiving sound signature. Battery life and low latency are appreciated, but the soundstage can feel flat on grand orchestral pieces.

Pros
  • Exceptional separation and resolution
  • Rich bass texture
  • Low latency with Bluetooth
  • Great with aptX lossless codecs
  • Excellent for electronic music
Cons
  • Fatiguing for movies and casual listening
  • Flat soundstage on grand orchestral pieces
  • Requires aptX-compatible source for best sound
👍 Sound quality 2
🤔 Analytical sound signature 2
👍 Battery life 1
👍 Latency 1
👍 Codec support 1
👎 Comfort for casual use 1

Scores

Music
Bowers & Wilkins
10
Beyerdynamic
88
Gaming
Bowers & Wilkins
5
Beyerdynamic
87
Studio
Bowers & Wilkins
10
Beyerdynamic
87
Budget
Bowers & Wilkins
21
Beyerdynamic
85
Work
Bowers & Wilkins
6
Beyerdynamic
78
Commute
Bowers & Wilkins
9
Beyerdynamic
74
Calls
Bowers & Wilkins
5
Beyerdynamic
67

Specifications

Bowers & Wilkins FP42978Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300
Design
Form Factor—over-ear
Open/Closed—closed
Foldable—✓★
Weight0.32 kg0.32 kg★
Ear Cushion—memory foam
Headband—memory foam
Audio
Driver Type—dynamic
Driver Size—45 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—5 Hz★
Freq Max—22 kHz★
Impedance—32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless—✓★
Bluetooth—5.4★
Profiles—AVDTP, AVDTP, GAVDP, SPP, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Detachable Cable—✓★
Range—15 m★
Battery
Battery Life—50 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—10 Minutes for 5 Hours
Charging—USB-C★
Microphone
Microphone—✓★
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✗
Boom Mic—✗
Detachable Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistant—Dolby Head Tracking Technology
Touch Controls—✗
App—Beyerdynamic
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✓★

Pros & Cons

Bowers & Wilkins FP42978

  • Below average connectivity (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 is €107 cheaper (1.4x less).

Bowers & Wilkins FP429780.036score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 3000.315score per dollar

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 offers 8.8x better value for money

Bowers & Wilkins FP42978

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Verdict

★ Winner: Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider