Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

Audio-Technica
81 Overall Score
vs
AKG K702

AKG K702

AKG
40 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

78 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT is widely praised for its exceptional battery life, comfort, and solid sound quality at an affordable price. While the noise cancellation is not the strongest, it effectively blocks fan noise and is competitive for the price. Some users report ear sweating and cramped ear pads, and a few found the sound flat or muddy. Overall, it is seen as a great all-rounder for daily use.

Pros
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Comfortable for long wear
  • Good sound quality for the price
  • Physical buttons instead of touch controls
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Ear sweating after 15 minutes
  • Cramped ear pads for some
  • No carrying case included
  • Noise cancellation not the strongest
  • Sound can be flat or muddy
👍 Battery life 6
👍 Comfort 5
🤔 Sound quality 7
🤔 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 5

AKG K702

85 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The AKG K702 headphones are praised for their wide soundstage, detailed mids and highs, and exceptional comfort, making them ideal for analytical listening, gaming, and studio mixing. However, users consistently note a lack of bass, especially sub-bass, which can be partially addressed with EQ. They are considered a great value when on sale, but not recommended for bass-heavy music genres like heavy rock.

Pros
  • Wide soundstage
  • Detailed mids and highs
  • Exceptional comfort
  • Great for analytical listening
  • Good value on sale
Cons
  • Lack of bass
  • Weak sub-bass
  • Requires amplification
  • Build feels a bit cheap
  • Not for bass-heavy music
👍 Soundstage 5
👎 Bass performance 5
👍 Comfort 4
🤔 Build quality 3
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Amplification requirement 3

Scores

Budget
Audio-Technica
85
AKG
46
Music
Audio-Technica
77
AKG
34
Commute
Audio-Technica
72
AKG
18
Studio
Audio-Technica
72
AKG
38
Work
Audio-Technica
71
AKG
14
Gaming
Audio-Technica
68
AKG
20
Calls
Audio-Technica
57
AKG
12

Specifications

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BTAKG K702
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedopen
Foldable✓★—
Weight0.26 kg★0.82 kg
Ear Cushion—3D-foam
Headband—genuine-leather
Audio
Driver TypedynamicVarimotion two-layer diaphragm
Driver Size40 mm★—
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz10 Hz★
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz★
Impedance45 Ω62 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB105 dB★
CodecsAAC, SBCAKG Pro Audio 2458X00190 (K702) Over-Ear, Open-Back, Flat-Wire, Reference Studio Headphones,Black
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typedigital hybrid—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.1★—
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired Connector3.5mmXLR
Detachable Cable✓✓
Cable Length1.2000000476837158 m3 m
Range10 m★—
Battery
Battery Life90 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging3 Minutes for 2.5 Hours—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Microphone
Microphone✓★—
Mic Count1★—
NC Mic✗—
Boom Mic✗—
Detachable Mic✗—
Mic PatternOmnidirectional—
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppAndroid & iOS—
Gaming Mode✓★—

Pros & Cons

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile

AKG K702

  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (72nd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT is €100 cheaper (2.3x less).

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT1.025score per dollar
vs
AKG K7020.225score per dollar

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT offers 4.6x better value for money

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

AKG K702

Verdict

★ Winner: Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT

Scores 81 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Audio-Technica ATH-S300BT Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider