KZ AS10
Technics EAH-AZ80
What Buyers Say
KZ AS10
The KZ AS10 is widely praised for its balanced, warm sound signature with detailed highs and punchy bass, offering excellent value for money. Users highlight its comfortable fit, good isolation, and build quality, though some report inconsistencies between units, particularly with bass response and treble harshness. It is recommended for both casual listening and professional in-ear monitoring, but potential buyers should be aware of possible quality control issues.
Pros
- Balanced and warm sound signature
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable fit for long listening
- Good isolation and low sound leak
- Detailed highs and punchy bass
Cons
- Inconsistent quality between units
- Bass may be lacking in some pairs
- Treble can be harsh on some units
- Slightly large for small ears
- May require burn-in for optimal sound
Technics EAH-AZ80
The Technics EAH-AZ10 earbuds receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their exceptional sound quality, featuring clear separation, wide soundstage, and natural tuning that rivals higher-end models. Users praise the comfortable and secure fit, effective noise cancellation that doesn't muddy the audio, and impressive battery life lasting up to 7 hours. However, a few critical reviews highlight poor touch controls that are unresponsive, and one user experienced a significant volume imbalance after 1.5 years, with the company offering only a 10% discount on a replacement rather than a fix. Overall, these are highly recommended for audiophiles and daily use, but potential buyers should be aware of possible durability and control issues.
Pros
- Exceptional sound quality with clear separation
- Comfortable and secure fit
- Effective noise cancellation without audio degradation
- Impressive battery life up to 7 hours
- Great call quality
Cons
- Unresponsive touch controls
- Volume imbalance after extended use
- Poor customer service for defects
- Bulky design for some users
- ANC not sufficient in very loud environments
Scores
Specifications
| KZ AS10 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | balanced armature | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 5★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 14 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | KZ AS10 IEM Headphone, 5 Balanced Armature Driver KZ Earbuds Wired Earphone, Stereo HiFi in Ear Monitor Headphone Musician Headset Earphone with Detachable 2 Pin Cable(No Microphone, Black) | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 16 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Pros & Cons
KZ AS10
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
KZ AS10
Technics EAH-AZ80
No current pricing available
Verdict
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 36 specs.
