TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
JVC HAEB75S
JVC
32 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
Specifications
| TOZO Crystal Pods | JVC HAEB75S | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-clip |
| Ear Tips | Medium | — |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | neodymium |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 13.5 mm★ |
| Drivers | 2 | 2 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | LDAC | — |
| Surround | Stereo, Surround | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 35 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 4★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Other | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | TOZO App | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | Water-Resistant |
Pros & Cons
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
JVC HAEB75S
- Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average comfort (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 37 specs.