ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026

ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026

ACEMAGIC
68 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
ACEMAGIC
15
HP
91
Developer
ACEMAGIC
61
HP
87
Creator
ACEMAGIC
25
HP
87
Home Office
ACEMAGIC
70
HP
87
Business
ACEMAGIC
60
HP
87
Workstation
ACEMAGIC
55
HP
85
Compact
ACEMAGIC
69
HP
30
Ai Llm
ACEMAGIC
27
HP
68

Specifications

ACEMAGIC M5HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i9 14900HX★AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
43,922
30,931
Cores24★8
Frequency2.2 GHz4.1 GHz★
L3 Cache36 MB★16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
28,703
Typeintegrated★discrete
VRAM—12 GB★
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5★
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD★SSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU—850W★
Weight1.35 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12★
USB Ports68★
Thunderbolt—0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.01 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.4b3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3★
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong cpu (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong port selection (74th percentile)
  • Strong storage (74th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average gpu (35th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.

ACEMAGIC M5 Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation