Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851

Intel
98 Overall Score
vs
AMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350 8-core Socket AM3+

AMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350 8-core Socket AM3+

AMD
44 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851

88 out of 100 high confidence 32 reviews

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is overwhelmingly praised for its raw performance, especially in 4K gaming and heavy multitasking, with users noting significant upgrades from older CPUs. It runs cool with proper cooling solutions, and its efficiency and support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are highlighted as major advantages. Some mention that it may not beat AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming, but it excels at 4K and productivity. A few note the lack of a cooler and tray packaging as minor drawbacks, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Excellent 4K gaming performance
  • Strong multitasking and productivity
  • Runs cool with proper cooling
  • Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
  • Power efficient (125W TDP)
Cons
  • No cooler included
  • Tray packaging (no retail box)
  • May lag AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming
  • Requires BIOS adjustments for best performance
  • Premium price
👍 Gaming performance 8
👍 Multitasking productivity 6
👍 Thermal management 5
👍 Power efficiency 4
👍 Memory support 4
👍 Value for money 3

AMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350 8-core Socket AM3+

72 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The AMD FX-8350 is a solid budget processor that performs well for gaming and everyday tasks, especially as an upgrade from older FX models. Users praise its value for the price, strong overclocking potential with good cooling, and the included Wraith cooler. However, some experienced bent pins on delivery, and a few noted compatibility issues with large coolers or that modern alternatives like Ryzen offer better upgrade paths.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong overclocking potential
  • Good gaming performance for the price
  • Included Wraith cooler is effective
  • Great upgrade from older FX CPUs
Cons
  • Risk of bent pins on delivery
  • No upgrade path on AM3+ socket
  • May require aftermarket cooler for serious workloads
  • Included thermal paste can be overly sticky
  • Some compatibility issues with large RAM heatsinks
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Overclocking potential 6
👍 Gaming performance 7
👍 Wraith cooler quality 6
👍 Durability and reliability 4
👎 Bent pins damage 2

Scores

Ai Llm
Intel
100
AMD
39
Productivity
Intel
100
AMD
48
Gaming
Intel
90
AMD
44
Budget
Intel
89
AMD
53
Efficiency
Intel
85
AMD
37
Server
Intel
84
AMD
37

Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 9 285KAMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCore Ultra 9FX
Model285KFX-8350
CodenameArrow Lake-SVishera
Classdesktopdesktop
Process3★32
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★8
P-cores88
E-cores16★—
Threads24★8
Base Clock
4,600
4,000
Boost Clock
5,700
4,200
Cache
L2 Cache40★8
L3 Cache36★8
Performance
PassMark Multi
67,227
6,096
PassMark Single
5,087
1,580
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR3-1866
Max Speed
6,400
1,866
Channels22
Max Memory
192
No data
ECC✓★✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1851Socket AM3+
PCIe5.02.0
PCIe Lanes24★—
TDP125125
Max Turbo Power250★—
Unlocked✓✓
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
NPU TOPS13★—

Pros & Cons

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851

  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average affordability (19th percentile)19th %ile

AMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350 8-core Socket AM3+

  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851

AMD FX-8000 Series FX-8350 8-core Socket AM3+

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity