Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel
98 Overall Score
vs
AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+

AMD
42 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

88 out of 100 high confidence 32 reviews

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is overwhelmingly praised for its raw performance, especially in 4K gaming and heavy multitasking, with users noting significant upgrades from older CPUs. It runs cool with proper cooling solutions, and its efficiency and support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are highlighted as major advantages. Some mention that it may not beat AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming, but it excels at 4K and productivity. A few note the lack of a cooler and tray packaging as minor drawbacks, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Excellent 4K gaming performance
  • Strong multitasking and productivity
  • Runs cool with proper cooling
  • Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
  • Power efficient (125W TDP)
Cons
  • No cooler included
  • Tray packaging (no retail box)
  • May lag AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming
  • Requires BIOS adjustments for best performance
  • Premium price
👍 Gaming performance 8
👍 Multitasking productivity 6
👍 Thermal management 5
👍 Power efficiency 4
👍 Memory support 4
👍 Value for money 3

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+

72 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The AMD FX-8300 is generally well-regarded for its value and performance in gaming and multitasking, with users praising its overclocking potential and compatibility with DDR3 RAM. However, several reviewers note that the stock cooler is loud and inefficient, recommending an aftermarket solution. There is also some confusion about the L3 cache specification, though one user confirmed it has 8MB. Overall, it's seen as a solid budget CPU, but potential buyers should consider waiting for newer options like Ryzen.

Pros
  • Good value for money
  • Strong overclocking potential
  • Compatible with DDR3 RAM
  • Handles gaming well
  • Stable at moderate overclocks
Cons
  • Stock cooler is loud
  • Stock cooler inefficient
  • L3 cache spec confusion
  • Not a huge upgrade over FX-6350
  • May need BIOS update
👎 Stock cooler 3
👍 Overclocking potential 3
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Ram compatibility 3
👍 Gaming performance 2
🤔 L3 cache spec 2

Scores

Ai Llm
Intel
100
AMD
37
Budget
Intel
100
AMD
44
Productivity
Intel
100
AMD
45
Gaming
Intel
90
AMD
41
Efficiency
Intel
85
AMD
41
Server
Intel
84
AMD
35

Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 9 285KAMD FX 8300
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCore Ultra 9FX
Model285KFD8300WMHKBOX
CodenameArrow Lake-SVishera
Classdesktopdesktop
Process3★32
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★8
P-cores8★—
E-cores16★—
Threads24★8
Base Clock
4,600
3,300
Boost Clock
5,700
4,200
Cache
L2 Cache40★8
L3 Cache36★8
Performance
PassMark Multi
67,259
5,325
PassMark Single
5,087
1,486
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR3
Max Speed
6,400
1,866
Channels22
Max Memory
192
No data
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1851AM3+
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes24★—
TDP12595★
Max Turbo Power250★—
Unlocked✓✓
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel Graphics—
NPU TOPS13★—

Pros & Cons

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+

  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
  • Below average single thread (34th percentile)

Pricing

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+ is €373 cheaper (3.0x less).

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.175score per dollar
vs
AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+0.221score per dollar

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+ offers 1.3x better value for money

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity