Fujifilm QuickSnap 7176742 Black 2025
Fujifilm
21 Overall Score
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016
Olympus
77 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Fujifilm QuickSnap 7176742 Black 2025
No customer feedback yet
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016
85 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is highly praised by users for its excellent image stabilization, lightweight design, and great value compared to the Mark III. Many appreciate its handling, focus stacking, and compatibility with Micro Four Thirds lenses, though some note the lack of GPS and slow-motion video. Overall, it is seen as a capable camera for landscape, nature, and street photography.
Pros
- Excellent image stabilization
- Lightweight and portable
- Great value for money
- Comfortable handling
- Focus stacking feature
Cons
- No built-in GPS
- No slow-motion video
- No pinch-to-zoom on touchscreen
- Screen protector may prevent flush closure
- Bulky charger cord
Image stabilization 4
Value for money 5
Build quality 3
Portability 4
Focus stacking 2
Gps 2
Scores
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Photography
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Travel
Product Photography
Video
Youtube
Specifications
| Fujifilm QuickSnap 7176742 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | — | 20.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic VIII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 60 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| Log Profile | — | ✗ |
| RAW Video | — | ✗ |
| Codec | — | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.50 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
| USB | — | USB-C 2.0★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm QuickSnap 7176742 Black 2025
- Below average connectivity (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong burst (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong stabilization (89th percentile)89th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm QuickSnap 7176742 Black 2025
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II
Scores 77 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 19 of 32 specs.
