OWC (OWC3C2D42R8256K)

OWC (OWC3C2D42R8256K)

OWC
9 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KLEVV (KD5KGUD80-60A300G-BLACK)

KLEVV (KD5KGUD80-60A300G-BLACK)

KLEVV
83 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
OWC
7
KLEVV
89
Gaming
OWC
8
KLEVV
89
Budget
OWC
13
KLEVV
78
Laptop
OWC
12
KLEVV
60
Server
OWC
10
KLEVV
39

Spezifikationen

OWCKLEVV
Memory
Type—DDR5★
Form Factor—UDIMM
Total CapacityKeine Daten
65,536
Modules—2★
Per ModuleKeine Daten
32,768
Pins—288
Performance
SpeedKeine Daten
6,000
CAS Latency—30★
Timings—30-36-36-76
Voltage—1.350000023841858★
Class
ECC—✗
Registered—✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO
Features
RGB—✓★
Heat Spreader—✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

OWC (OWC3C2D42R8256K)

  • Below average capacity (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average latency (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average speed (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

KLEVV (KD5KGUD80-60A300G-BLACK)

  • Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average affordability (9th percentile)9th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: KLEVV

Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 9 of 15 specs.

KLEVV Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation