Kingston KVR32N22S8/8

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8

Kingston
51 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B

Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B

Crucial
86 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Kingston
47
Crucial
91
Budget
Kingston
59
Crucial
90
Workstation
Kingston
46
Crucial
87
Laptop
Kingston
37
Crucial
63
Server
Kingston
22
Crucial
38

Spezifikationen

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Memory
TypeDDR4DDR5★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
8,192
32,768
Modules12★
Per Module
8,192
16,384
Pins288288
Rank1Rx8—
Performance
Speed
3,200
6,400
CAS Latency22★38
Timings22-22-2238-40-40-84
Voltage1.2000000476837158★1.350000023841858
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC ProfileIntel XMP 2.0Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader✗✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8

  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)

Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B

  • Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong latency (77th percentile)
  • Strong feature (73rd percentile)

Preise

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8 is 460 € cheaper (5.8x less).

Kingston KVR32N22S8/80.539Score pro Dollar
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B0.155Score pro Dollar

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8 bietet 3.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kingston KVR32N22S8/8

Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B

Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.

Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen