Crucial 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT51264BF160BJ)
Crucial
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Netac
Netac
58 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Crucial 4GB DDR3 SODIMM | Netac | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 204 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 16 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | — | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Crucial 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT51264BF160BJ)
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Preise
Crucial 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT51264BF160BJ)1.471Score pro Dollar
vs
Netac0.603Score pro Dollar
Crucial 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT51264BF160BJ) bietet 2.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.
