Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Yongnuo 16MM

Yongnuo 16MM

Yongnuo
59 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Fujifilm
81
Yongnuo
55
Macro
Fujifilm
79
Yongnuo
73
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
76
Yongnuo
44
Street
Fujifilm
72
Yongnuo
60
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
71
Yongnuo
51
Budget
Fujifilm
70
Yongnuo
51
Landscape
Fujifilm
64
Yongnuo
58
Travel
Fujifilm
60
Yongnuo
64
Portrait
Fujifilm
63
Yongnuo
48

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mmYongnuo 16MM
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm16 mm
Elements1510
Groups98
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements12
CoatingSuper EBC coatingNano Multilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/16
Min Aperturef/1.4f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.27 kg
Filter Thread62 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorDSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm17 mm
Max Magnification1:6.671:6.67

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Yongnuo 16MM

  • Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

No current pricing available

Yongnuo 16MM

Fazit

Gewinner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Yongnuo 16MM Besser bei:

Travel

Auch in Betracht ziehen