Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
93 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
74
Tamron
89
Budget
Nikon
78
Tamron
88
Portrait
Nikon
78
Tamron
87
Video Cinema
Nikon
76
Tamron
86
Macro
Nikon
79
Tamron
84
Landscape
Nikon
66
Tamron
77
Street
Nikon
69
Tamron
76
Travel
Nikon
58
Tamron
72
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
Tamron
69

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm75 mm
Elements1717
Groups1215
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements22
CoatingNano Crystal CoatFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.68 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorVXD
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm180 mm
Max Magnification1:41:2.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Fazit

Gewinner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen