Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm

Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm

Rokinon
35 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Sigma
59
Rokinon
65
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Rokinon
56
Budget
Sigma
56
Rokinon
38
Professional
Sigma
42
Rokinon
52
Street
Sigma
46
Rokinon
49
Travel
Sigma
40
Rokinon
25
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Rokinon
32
Landscape
Sigma
33
Rokinon
37
Macro
Sigma
16
Rokinon
35

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSRokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm24 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingUMC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperturef/3.5
Constant
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weight0.73 kg
Filter Thread82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm

  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 17 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

BudgetTravelWildlife Sports

Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm Besser bei:

MacroStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema