Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
Leitz Cine
27 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 4 | — |
| Coating | Nano | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.1 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.84 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 220 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:1.7★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 17 specs.