Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon L EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM 100mm

Canon L EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM 100mm

Canon
65 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
69
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
40
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
53
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
64
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
80
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
66
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
71
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
77
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
57

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon L EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM 100mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm100 mm
Elements1315
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements30
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.63 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:1

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon L EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM 100mm

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema