Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon SP 14mm f/2.4 14mm

Rokinon SP 14mm f/2.4 14mm

Rokinon
26 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Rokinon
29
Portrait
Nikon
89
Rokinon
30
Street
Nikon
86
Rokinon
26
Budget
Nikon
86
Rokinon
26
Macro
Nikon
85
Rokinon
57
Landscape
Nikon
83
Rokinon
38
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Rokinon
23
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Rokinon
18
Travel
Nikon
75
Rokinon
18

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon SP 14mm f/2.4 14mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm14 mm
Elements1318
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-CoatedUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.95 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:12.5

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon SP 14mm f/2.4 14mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports