Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 100mm

BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 100mm

BLAZAR LENS
51 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
BLAZAR LENS
41
Macro
Nikon
88
BLAZAR LENS
22
Budget
Nikon
85
BLAZAR LENS
57
Street
Nikon
84
BLAZAR LENS
60
Portrait
Nikon
84
BLAZAR LENS
63
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
BLAZAR LENS
50
Landscape
Nikon
79
BLAZAR LENS
36
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
BLAZAR LENS
36
Travel
Nikon
70
BLAZAR LENS
54

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 100mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm100 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades916★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 100mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports