Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
XuanLens ORF 32mm

XuanLens ORF 32mm

XuanLens
52 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Tamron
79
XuanLens
50
Macro
Tamron
76
XuanLens
66
Budget
Tamron
75
XuanLens
48
Landscape
Tamron
73
XuanLens
38
Street
Tamron
62
XuanLens
49
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
60
XuanLens
36
Professional
Tamron
59
XuanLens
45
Video Cinema
Tamron
58
XuanLens
48
Portrait
Tamron
50
XuanLens
44

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mmXuanLens ORF 32mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min18 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm32 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingInternal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/18f/10
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/10
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon RF
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.40 kg0.04 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto Focusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance498 mm32 mm
Max Magnification1:3.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (34th percentile)

XuanLens ORF 32mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Scores 68 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports