Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
7Artisans Photoelectric 75mm f/1.25 II 75mm

7Artisans Photoelectric 75mm f/1.25 II 75mm

7Artisans
32 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
7Artisans
26
Portrait
Sigma
90
7Artisans
36
Street
Sigma
88
7Artisans
29
Budget
Sigma
85
7Artisans
28
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
7Artisans
24
Macro
Sigma
83
7Artisans
33
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
7Artisans
21
Landscape
Sigma
77
7Artisans
23
Travel
Sigma
75
7Artisans
20

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm7Artisans Photoelectric 75mm f/1.25 II 75mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm75 mm
Elements167
Groups116
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.25
Constant
Diaphragm Blades912
Build
MountSony ELeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.51 kg
Filter Thread72 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm800 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

7Artisans Photoelectric 75mm f/1.25 II 75mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports