Sigma AF DC 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM

Sigma
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
64
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
74
Nikon
88
Budget
Sigma
73
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
72
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
72
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
68
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
65
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
61
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
64
Nikon
70

Spezifikationen

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm28 mm
Elements1513
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements23★
Coatingsuper multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ANikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.39 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:4.41:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports