Canon EF-M EF-M22mm F2 STM 6-55mm

Canon EF-M EF-M22mm F2 STM 6-55mm

Canon
75 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Canon
63
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
67
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
81
Nikon
85
Street
Canon
79
Nikon
84
Portrait
Canon
69
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Canon
68
Nikon
82
Landscape
Canon
48
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Canon
59
Nikon
73
Travel
Canon
71
Nikon
70

Spezifikationen

Canon EF-M EF-M22mm F2 STM 6-55mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min6 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-MNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.10 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread43 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance150 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon EF-M EF-M22mm F2 STM 6-55mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports