HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
STGAubron ABR0422 Black 2025

STGAubron ABR0422 Black 2025

STGAubron
59 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
STGAubron
60
Creator
HP
87
STGAubron
44
Developer
HP
87
STGAubron
42
Home Office
HP
87
STGAubron
56
Business
HP
87
STGAubron
49
Workstation
HP
86
STGAubron
41
Ai Llm
HP
67
STGAubron
39
Compact
HP
30
STGAubron
34

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364STGAubron ABR0422
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★Intel Core i7 4770
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
7,068
Cores8★4
Frequency4.1 GHz★3.4 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB★8 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
16,472
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM12 GB★8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7GDDR6★
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5★DDR3
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towerdesktop
PSU850W★—
Weight14.50 kg9.07 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2★—
USB Ports8★7
Thunderbolt0—
HDMI1 x HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3★Bluetooth 5.0
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

STGAubron ABR0422 Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong port selection (73rd percentile)
  • Strong gpu (66th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average cpu (13th percentile)13th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

STGAubron ABR0422 Besser bei:

Compact