MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Core i5 10400 6-core LGA 1200
Intel
63 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel Core i5 10400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Core i5 |
| Model | — | 10400 |
| Codename | — | Comet Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 6★ |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | — | 12★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1.5★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 12★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1200 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 134★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel Core i5 10400 6-core LGA 1200
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong efficiency (75th percentile)
- Strong single thread (72nd percentile)
- Strong platform (69th percentile)
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.035Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Core i5 10400 6-core LGA 12000.356Score pro Dollar
Intel Core i5 10400 6-core LGA 1200 bietet 10.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 27 specs.
