Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
Intel
45 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
MSI
16 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Server
Ai Llm
Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron G5900 | MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | Ryzen 9 |
| Model | G5900 | 9000 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2★ | — |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 2★ | — |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 2★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Keine Daten | |
| PassMark Single | Keine Daten | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16★ | — |
| TDP | 58★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
- Strong single thread (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong platform (75th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Preise
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 12000.599Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.042Score pro Dollar
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200 bietet 14.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Intel Celeron G5900
Scores 45 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.
