Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF 9521B002 24-105mm
Canon
61 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF 9521B002 24-105mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 105 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/40 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.53 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 131 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.3x★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon RF 9521B002 24-105mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
결론
승자: Canon RF 9521B002 24-105mm
Scores 61 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.