Philips TAE5008/38

Philips TAE5008/38

Philips
22 Overall Score
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Philips
33
TOZO
79
Gaming
Philips
16
TOZO
79
Travel
Philips
14
TOZO
78
Fitness
Philips
11
TOZO
72
Calls
Philips
16
TOZO
70
Commute
Philips
13
TOZO
70
Music
Philips
16
TOZO
68

Specifications

Philips TAE5008/38TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylein-eartrue wireless
Ear Tipsthree sizes of interchangeable rubber ear tipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsPhilips Wired Earbuds USB C with Microphone, in Ear Type C Headphones with mic, Powerful Bass, Lightweight, USB-C Wired Earphones, 3-Button in-line Remote Ear Buds (Black)LDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice Assistantvoice assistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

Philips TAE5008/38

  • Below average connectivity (28th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Pricing

Philips TAE5008/38

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider