7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm

7Artisans
52 综合评分
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 综合评分

评分

Professional
7Artisans
45
Sigma
86
Street
7Artisans
58
Sigma
86
Macro
7Artisans
65
Sigma
82
Portrait
7Artisans
64
Sigma
81
Travel
7Artisans
40
Sigma
80
Budget
7Artisans
44
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
7Artisans
43
Sigma
74
Landscape
7Artisans
34
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
7Artisans
33
Sigma
66

规格

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typefisheyewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min4 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max4 mm18 mm
Elements1013
Groups810
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/16f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.20 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeManual FocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance85 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:4

优缺点

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm

  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

价格

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm is CA$717 cheaper (4.5x less).

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm0.255每美元得分
vs
Sigma 2079750.093每美元得分

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm 性价比高 2.7 倍

7Artisans 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye 4mm

结论

胜出: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑