Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS
Sony
66 Загальна оцінка
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Загальна оцінка
Оцінки
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Video Cinema
Landscape
Macro
Travel
Характеристики
| Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS | Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 240 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 16 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 5★ | 4 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Coating | T* | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 22-40★ | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor★ | Stepping AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x | 1:5.55★ |
Плюси та мінуси
Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Ціни
Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS0.055балів за долар
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076балів за долар
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm пропонує у 1.4x краще співвідношення ціна-якість
Вердикт
Переможець: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
