Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Pontuação geral
vs
Bower SLY1620OD

Bower SLY1620OD

Bower
54 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Macro
Canon
91
Bower
65
Landscape
Canon
83
Bower
31
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Bower
47
Professional
Canon
82
Bower
47
Travel
Canon
82
Bower
25
Budget
Canon
80
Bower
48
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Bower
38
Portrait
Canon
53
Bower
72
Street
Canon
68
Bower
53

Especificações

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMBower SLY1620OD
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm16 mm
Elements1513
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon RFFour Thirds
Formatfull-frameFour Thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.97 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm198 mm
Max Magnification1:4.2

Prós e Contras

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Bower SLY1620OD

  • Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average build (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preços

Bower SLY1620OD is CA$ 747 cheaper (2.1x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.063pontos por dólar
vs
Bower SLY1620OD0.083pontos por dólar

Bower SLY1620OD oferece 1.3x melhor custo-benefício

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Bower SLY1620OD

Veredito

Vencedor: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Bower SLY1620OD Melhor em:

Portrait

Considere também