ViewSonic VG1655 15.6" Black 2020
ViewSonic
41 종합 점수
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 종합 점수
점수
Office
Portable
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
사양
| ViewSonic VG1655 15.6" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 14 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.2 Million Colors (6-Bit+FRC) | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 6-bit+FRC | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 2 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 8W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 0.82 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
장단점
ViewSonic VG1655 15.6" Black 2020
- Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong connectivity (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average performance (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average color (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (29th percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
가격
ViewSonic VG1655 15.6" Black 20200.162달러당 점수
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.081달러당 점수
ViewSonic VG1655 15.6" Black 2020 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.
