Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Canon
78 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 종합 점수
점수
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 16 |
| Groups | 18 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.31 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM★ | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x | 1:4.8★ |
장단점
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
가격
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z0.019달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.119달러당 점수
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 6.3배 더 나은 가성비
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
결론
승자: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
